Deliver Us from Evil is a classic book with a timeless message on the
subject of evil. Written by beloved speaker and author Ravi Zacharias, the book
is divided into three sections:
Section One: The
Moods of the Present
Section Two:
Voices from the Past
Section Three:
The Face of the Future
In
Section One : The Moods of the Present, Ravi proposes that there are three
theories that give birth to unspeakable evil in any society, and the theories
are: Secularism, Pluralism and Privatisation.
According
to Ravi, secularism (the assertion that public life is to be conducted without
reference to religion) is the first step to unmanageable evil. In his own words:
‘ If the supernatural is irrational, what will the secularist use as a point of
reference for rationality?...Or is each one to depend on his or her own inner
voice? How then does one differentiate between the inner voices of reason and
unreason in that case?’
Ravi
waxes philosophical here and proposes that secularism leads to a loss of shame because there is no reference point for evil. He further states that the evils
done to children by responsible adults and family members are not crimes born
of hate but are passions unleashed and justified by a conscience bereft of
shame or remorse.
Pluralism as defined in the book is the existence...of a number of world views, each
vying for the allegiance of individuals, with no single world view dominant. According
to Ravi, the great hazard of pluralism is the faulty deduction in the name of
tolerance that all beliefs can be equally true. Ravi states that secularism
leads to a loss of shame and pluralism leads to a loss of reason. He further
asserts that while secularism breeds an evil that can victimize those we love,
pluralism breeds an evil that victimizes those different from us, those we do
not claim to love.
Privatisation
of religion as described in the book is the socially required and legally
enforced separation of our private lives and public personas. It mandates that
issues of ultimate meaning be relegated to our private spheres. Ravi proposes
that privatisation leads to a loss of meaning and that it victimizes the self. According
to him, to imprison a sacred belief within a private realm is to kill the
belief until people no longer know who they are. He further makes the assertion
that the premise of privatisation is flawed because it assumes that one's private
beliefs have nothing to do with public life, whereas in reality who we are in
public is determined by what we learned and cherished in private.
In
Section Two, Ravi goes on to refer to the history of great civilizations in the
past and lessons that can be learned from them, while in Section Three, he makes
a case for moral absolutes which enables man have a point of reference. According
to him, the first step in receiving deliverance from evil is accepting that
there are moral boundaries that should not be crossed. He postulates that the
refusal to draw a line between the sacred and the profane, the pulling down of
moral fences, is what leads to uncontrollable evil in any society. He also
argues that true and effective morality is dependent upon reverence for God,
stating that without reverence there is no morality and without God there is no
reverence, thus, the inability of the perpetrator of wickedness to feel emotion
is the result of a society that has trained itself not to feel guilty when
wrong is committed.
Deliver
Us from Evil is a profound and philosophical book and it is clear from the
book that Ravi Zacharias is a student of history as well as an ardent reader of
literature, hence the quotes from books like Oscar Wilde's Picture of
Dorian Gray, Goethe’s Faust, etc. This serves as an excellent motivator for reading Ravi
Zacharias’ books. If one will not read them for the philosophical content contained
therein, one can at least read his books to tap into the wealth of history and
literature contained within.
Fantastic review.
ReplyDeleteI particularly love this "the first step in receiving deliverance from evil is accepting that there are moral boundaries that should not be crossed."
Kudos
Thanks
ReplyDeleteI always thought that separating the sacred from the secular created room for excellence because of how many religious people had used religion as an excuse to promote mediocrity. But I now know that the sacred forms the bridge rail for the secular. Actually, finding the right weave of the sacred and the secular is the right thing to do. We must find the sacred in the secular.
ReplyDeleteI quite agree with you.
ReplyDeleteI also felt at a time that the secular should be separated from the sacred because of the havoc wreaked by some religious fellows in the past and even in some societies presently, however, after careful observation and analysis of different religious and secular societies, I have come to the conclusion that the evil wreaked by godless societies is worse and more perplexing than that wreaked by religious societies.
For instance, when a person who believes in God commits a crime,he/she experiences guilt when the conscience is appealed to and thus may genuinely repent of the crime. When a person who neither believes in God nor moral absolutes commits a crime,what can be appealed to? How do you even convince the person that what he/she did is wrong bearing in mind the fact that to the individual,there is no wrong or right; every thing is relative? Even putting the individual in prison is not so effective because society is safe only as long as the individual is in prison. Upon release from prison, he/she still commits the same crime because there was no genuine repentance in the first place.
In trying to free herself from the'shackles' of religion, secular society ended up shooting herself in the foot.